top of page

Does This Sound Familiar?


The Great Awakening represented a reaction against the increasing secularization of society and against the corporate and materialistic nature of the principal churches of American society. (1720-1740).


The second Great Awakening, an attempt to convert people to Protestantism (1795-1835) led to the founding of colleges and seminaries and to the organization of mission societies. Perhaps unintentionally crafting an industry out of that movement, one that only further divided the sacred community from the secular.


The Third may now be fomenting among spiritually motivated, younger entrepreneurs within the marketplace, seeking authentic community and an opportunity to explore their own unique gifts, apart from what brings value soley to the institution they have known as church.


My guess is the congregations that nurture those marketplace giftings, parallel with opportunities to express one's faith in the greater community and in tangible ways, will thrive.


Those who struggle to maintain nonessential denominational positions, isolating themselves from the greater Body of Christ, while attempting to appear relevant by means of various worship styles, all to sustain the carrying costs of isolated campuses, will disappear.


Just being real!

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
In The Order (the pattern) Of Melchizedek

It's been my privilege now for 77 years to grow up on the fringes of institutional religion. Now only in my third institutional church, my journey has rubbed spiritual shoulders with many denominatio

 
 
 
On Aging and Personal Impact

I'm in a strange season of my life. One deeply spiritual, highly motivated, and now well-experienced, though acutely aware of my vulnerability and personal limitations. Maybe for the first time ever

 
 
 

2 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bgrubb102
Aug 26, 2023
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Most early colleges were founded by the church

Like
John Bost
John Bost
Aug 26, 2023
Replying to

Then churches gradually abandoned their contributions to society, either for financial reasons or doctrinal preferences that emerged which brought conflict with the leadership of those churches.


I always wonder what would have happened had they prayerfully stayed at the table with both funds and the willingness to progress as the Spirit led, versus following the most strong willed of leaders involved in the chaos that always accompanies conflict and change.

Like
bottom of page